摘要:近期的项目,前端的是在上跑的,然后向我们后端的开发服务器进行请求。那怎么去掉这个功能呢,我们现在就是要进行跨域请求。这里里面有就直接进入了,没有下面的检查了。所以我们只要自己给添加一个这样的属性就好了。最直接的方法还是去写一个啊,哈哈。
近期的项目,前端的js是在localhost上跑的,然后向我们后端的开发服务器进行请求。但是突然前端说所有的post请求都报csrf校验错误了,甚是奇怪,之前为了开发方便已经把django的csrf middleware注释掉了啊,为什么还会错误,由于返回值格式还是django rest的通用格式,肯定问题是出在这里面,于是翻了一下它的源代码看了看。
from django.middleware.csrf import CsrfViewMiddleware class CSRFCheck(CsrfViewMiddleware): def _reject(self, request, reason): # Return the failure reason instead of an HttpResponse return reason class SessionAuthentication(BaseAuthentication): """ Use Django"s session framework for authentication. """ def authenticate(self, request): """ Returns a `User` if the request session currently has a logged in user. Otherwise returns `None`. """ # Get the underlying HttpRequest object request = request._request user = getattr(request, "user", None) # Unauthenticated, CSRF validation not required if not user or not user.is_active: return None self.enforce_csrf(request) # CSRF passed with authenticated user return (user, None) def enforce_csrf(self, request): """ Enforce CSRF validation for session based authentication. """ reason = CSRFCheck().process_view(request, None, (), {}) if reason: # CSRF failed, bail with explicit error message raise exceptions.PermissionDenied("CSRF Failed: %s" % reason)
原来是这样,最近给系统增加了用户登陆功能,使用的就是SessionAuthorization和TokenAuthorization,然后在SessionAuthorization中调用了self.enforce_csrf(request)而这个调用的又是上面的CSRFCheck,这个类是重载了django里面的csrf middleware,而且没发现有地方可以关掉这个功能,即使在django里面去掉这个middleware,但是这个还是会调用的。
那怎么去掉这个功能呢,我们现在就是要进行跨域请求。
最简单了,直接注释掉上面的self.enforce_csrf(request)这一行代码就行了或者在设置中添加一项,比如改成
GLOBAL_CSRF_CHECK = True if GLOBAL_CSRF_CHECK: self.enforce_csrf(request)
我们继续看源代码,到middleware的代码里面去。
class CsrfViewMiddleware(object): """ Middleware that requires a present and correct csrfmiddlewaretoken for POST requests that have a CSRF cookie, and sets an outgoing CSRF cookie. This middleware should be used in conjunction with the csrf_token template tag. """ # The _accept and _reject methods currently only exist for the sake of the # requires_csrf_token decorator. def _accept(self, request): # Avoid checking the request twice by adding a custom attribute to # request. This will be relevant when both decorator and middleware # are used. request.csrf_processing_done = True return None def _reject(self, request, reason): logger.warning("Forbidden (%s): %s", reason, request.path, extra={ "status_code": 403, "request": request, } ) return _get_failure_view()(request, reason=reason) def process_view(self, request, callback, callback_args, callback_kwargs): if getattr(request, "csrf_processing_done", False): return None try: csrf_token = _sanitize_token( request.COOKIES[settings.CSRF_COOKIE_NAME]) # Use same token next time request.META["CSRF_COOKIE"] = csrf_token except KeyError: csrf_token = None # Generate token and store it in the request, so it"s # available to the view. request.META["CSRF_COOKIE"] = _get_new_csrf_key() # Wait until request.META["CSRF_COOKIE"] has been manipulated before # bailing out, so that get_token still works if getattr(callback, "csrf_exempt", False): return None # Assume that anything not defined as "safe" by RFC2616 needs protection if request.method not in ("GET", "HEAD", "OPTIONS", "TRACE"): if getattr(request, "_dont_enforce_csrf_checks", False): # Mechanism to turn off CSRF checks for test suite. # It comes after the creation of CSRF cookies, so that # everything else continues to work exactly the same # (e.g. cookies are sent, etc.), but before any # branches that call reject(). return self._accept(request) if request.is_secure(): # Suppose user visits http://example.com/ # An active network attacker (man-in-the-middle, MITM) sends a # POST form that targets https://example.com/detonate-bomb/ and # submits it via JavaScript. # # The attacker will need to provide a CSRF cookie and token, but # that"s no problem for a MITM and the session-independent # nonce we"re using. So the MITM can circumvent the CSRF # protection. This is true for any HTTP connection, but anyone # using HTTPS expects better! For this reason, for # https://example.com/ we need additional protection that treats # http://example.com/ as completely untrusted. Under HTTPS, # Barth et al. found that the Referer header is missing for # same-domain requests in only about 0.2% of cases or less, so # we can use strict Referer checking. referer = request.META.get("HTTP_REFERER") if referer is None: return self._reject(request, REASON_NO_REFERER) # Note that request.get_host() includes the port. good_referer = "https://%s/" % request.get_host() if not same_origin(referer, good_referer): reason = REASON_BAD_REFERER % (referer, good_referer) return self._reject(request, reason) if csrf_token is None: # No CSRF cookie. For POST requests, we insist on a CSRF cookie, # and in this way we can avoid all CSRF attacks, including login # CSRF. return self._reject(request, REASON_NO_CSRF_COOKIE) # Check non-cookie token for match. request_csrf_token = "" if request.method == "POST": request_csrf_token = request.POST.get("csrfmiddlewaretoken", "") if request_csrf_token == "": # Fall back to X-CSRFToken, to make things easier for AJAX, # and possible for PUT/DELETE. request_csrf_token = request.META.get("HTTP_X_CSRFTOKEN", "") if not constant_time_compare(request_csrf_token, csrf_token): return self._reject(request, REASON_BAD_TOKEN) return self._accept(request) def process_response(self, request, response): if getattr(response, "csrf_processing_done", False): return response # If CSRF_COOKIE is unset, then CsrfViewMiddleware.process_view was # never called, probaby because a request middleware returned a response # (for example, contrib.auth redirecting to a login page). if request.META.get("CSRF_COOKIE") is None: return response if not request.META.get("CSRF_COOKIE_USED", False): return response # Set the CSRF cookie even if it"s already set, so we renew # the expiry timer. response.set_cookie(settings.CSRF_COOKIE_NAME, request.META["CSRF_COOKIE"], max_age = 60 * 60 * 24 * 7 * 52, domain=settings.CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN, path=settings.CSRF_COOKIE_PATH, secure=settings.CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE, httponly=settings.CSRF_COOKIE_HTTPONLY ) # Content varies with the CSRF cookie, so set the Vary header. patch_vary_headers(response, ("Cookie",)) response.csrf_processing_done = True return response
里面主要有两个函数,一个是process view,另一个是process response。这里就不得不说django middleware的工作原理了。
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/http/middleware/
process_request() is called on each request, before Django decides which view to execute. process_view() is called just before Django calls the view. process_response() is called on all responses before they’re returned to the browser.
所以这个middleware的process view会在请求到达view函数之前被调用,可以理解为一个过滤器吧。
if request.method not in ("GET", "HEAD", "OPTIONS", "TRACE"): if getattr(request, "_dont_enforce_csrf_checks", False): return self._accept(request)
这里request里面有_dont_enforce_csrf_checks就直接进入view了,没有下面的检查了。所以我们只要自己给request添加一个这样的属性就好了。最直接的方法还是去写一个middleware啊,哈哈。
代码很简单
class DisableCSRFCheck(object): def process_request(self, request): setattr(request, "_dont_enforce_csrf_checks", True)
文章版权归作者所有,未经允许请勿转载,若此文章存在违规行为,您可以联系管理员删除。
转载请注明本文地址:https://www.ucloud.cn/yun/37459.html
摘要:更新尝试了一下实现前后端分离,新的文章如下前后端分离之初试更新可另外用实现前后端分离,这篇文章可能局限性太大,只是个人的入门实践刚刚学习前端快一年,后台方面了解甚少,于是决定踩踩坑,学习一下。 2018.9.6更新:尝试了一下REST framework实现前后端分离,新的文章如下Django前后端分离之REST framework初试 2018.8.27更新:可另外用 restful...
摘要:看起来不错再次,它现在仍然非常类似于基于功能的视图。我们还需要重构一下我们使用基于类的视图。中文文档目录中文教程序列化中文教程请求和响应中文教程基于类的视图中文教程验证和权限中文教程关系和超链接中文教程中文教程模式和客户端库 我们也可以使用基于类的视图编写我们的API视图,而不是基于函数的视图。我们将看到这是一个强大的模式,允许我们重用常用功能,并帮助我们保持代码DRY。 使用基于类的...
摘要:看起来不错再次,它现在仍然非常类似于基于功能的视图。我们还需要重构一下我们使用基于类的视图。中文文档目录中文教程序列化中文教程请求和响应中文教程基于类的视图中文教程验证和权限中文教程关系和超链接中文教程中文教程模式和客户端库 我们也可以使用基于类的视图编写我们的API视图,而不是基于函数的视图。我们将看到这是一个强大的模式,允许我们重用常用功能,并帮助我们保持代码DRY。 使用基于类的...
摘要:看起来不错再次,它现在仍然非常类似于基于功能的视图。我们还需要重构一下我们使用基于类的视图。中文文档目录中文教程序列化中文教程请求和响应中文教程基于类的视图中文教程验证和权限中文教程关系和超链接中文教程中文教程模式和客户端库 我们也可以使用基于类的视图编写我们的API视图,而不是基于函数的视图。我们将看到这是一个强大的模式,允许我们重用常用功能,并帮助我们保持代码DRY。 使用基于类的...
阅读 2286·2021-11-10 11:35
阅读 898·2021-09-26 09:55
阅读 2387·2021-09-22 15:22
阅读 2318·2021-09-22 15:17
阅读 3679·2021-09-09 09:33
阅读 1821·2019-08-30 11:22
阅读 969·2019-08-30 10:57
阅读 641·2019-08-29 16:10